Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41155128›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

New Gait Representation Maps for Enhanced Recognition in Clinical Gait Analysis.

Nagwan Abdel Samee, Mohammed A Al-Masni, Eman N Marzban, Abobakr Khalil Al-Shamiri, Mugahed A Al-Antari, Maali Ibrahim Alabdulhafith, Noha F Mahmoud, Yasser M Kadah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nagwan Abdel SameeDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5957-1383
Mohammed A Al-MasniDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, College of Artificial Intelligence Convergence, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1548-965X
Eman N MarzbanBiomedical Engineering Department, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6021-8664
Abobakr Khalil Al-ShamiriSchool of Computer Science, University of Southampton Malaysia, Iskandar Puteri 79100, Johor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5872-4066
Mugahed A Al-AntariDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, College of Artificial Intelligence Convergence, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4457-4407
Maali Ibrahim AlabdulhafithDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4107-5274
Noha F MahmoudRehabilitation Sciences Department, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences College, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0608-6661
Yasser M KadahElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22254, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2166-3191

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project PNURSP2025R206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait analysis is essential in the evaluation of neuromuscular and musculoskeletal disorders; however, traditional approaches based on expert visual observation remain subjective and often lack consistency. Accurate and objective assessment of gait impairments is critical for early diagnosis, monitoring rehabilitation progress, and guiding clinical decision-making. Although Gait Energy Images (GEI) have become widely used in automated, vision-based gait analysis, they are limited in capturing boundary details and time-resolved motion dynamics, both critical for robust clinical interpretation. To overcome these limitations, we introduce four novel gait representation maps: the time-coded gait boundary image (tGBI), color-coded GEI (cGEI), time-coded gait delta image (tGDI), and color-coded boundary-to-image transform (cBIT). These representations are specifically designed to embed spatial, temporal, and boundary-specific features of the gait cycle, and are constructed from binary silhouette sequences through straightforward yet effective transformations that preserve key structural and dynamic information. Experiments on the INIT GAIT dataset demonstrate that the proposed representations consistently outperform the conventional GEI across multiple machine learning models and classification tasks involving different numbers of gait impairment categories (four and six classes). These findings highlight the potential of the proposed approaches to enhance the accuracy and reliability of automated clinical gait analysis.

Indexed as

deep learninggait analysisgait cycle mapsgait impairmentgait pathology classification

Identifiers

PMID41155128
PMCPMC12561590

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.