ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Estrogenic Effect of Probiotics on Anxiety and Depression: A Narrative Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Crosstalk Between Gut Microbiota, Epigenome, and Neurotransmitters in Health and Disease.Cells · 2026Review
- Metabolic-Epigenetic-Immune axis in Ischemic Stroke: Lactate-derived Lactylation as a Key Regulator.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Review
- The Combination ofNutrients · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anxiety and depression are mental disorders with significant global impact, and are especially prominent in women during times of hormonal fluctuations. The microbiota-gut-brain axis (MGB axis) has emerged as a crucial pathway in the pathogenesis of these disorders, as it directly influences the production of neurotransmitters such as serotonin (5-HT), gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and dopamine (DA). In addition, they have shown estrogenic effects through enzymes such as β-glucuronidase, which modulate hormone metabolism and consequently mood. A comprehensive search of recent preclinical studies has found that probiotic intake in female rats led to significant improvements in anxiety- and depression-related behaviors. Similarly, clinical trials in certain populations, particularly women with hormonal imbalances during menopause or premenstrual syndrome, have shown promising results. However, there are still significant problems, such as the individual variability of responses and the need for controlled long-term studies. The development of specific probiotics for hormonal modulation and the implementation of personalized approaches integrating omics and neuroimaging technologies to optimize therapeutic interventions in the field of mental health are promising. Accordingly, a comprehensive search was conducted in scientific databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Web of Science. Preclinical studies investigating the estrogenic effects of different probiotic strains in animal models and in controlled clinical trials during chronic treatment were selected, excluding those studies that did not provide access to full text.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.