ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Vascular Disruption Therapy as a New Strategy for Cancer Treatment.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of lipid metabolism remodeling in the tumor microenvironment on angiogenesis.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Targeting Tumour Heterogeneity through sequential timing of anti-hallmark combination therapies -a hypothesis for implementation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Deep Tumor Penetration Using Nanoparticle Delivery Systems: Programmed Design Strategies and Emerging Evaluation Platforms.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A functional blood vessel network is required to deliver oxygen and nutrients to the cancer cells for their growth. Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing ones, is one of the major mechanisms to create this vascular network. Anti-angiogenic therapy was conceived as the inhibition of the cellular and molecular players involved in tumor angiogenesis such as vascular endothelial growth factor and its main receptors. Due to limitations of this therapy, different approaches of vessel modulation such as vascular normalization or vascular promotion have been studied showing benefits in different tumor models and clinical trials. In contrast to anti-angiogenic therapy, which inhibits the blood vessels that are being formed, vascular disruption therapy aims to destroy already formed tumor vessels. These malignant vascular structures differ from other blood vessels in terms of endothelial cell states, pericyte coverage and basement membrane development. The molecules used for vascular disruption are microtubule-binding molecules, flavonoids that induce endothelial cell apoptosis or molecules vectorized to endothelial receptors. Many vascular disruption agents have been tested in clinical trials showing some promising results, but with some limitations that include resistant rim cells or the development of hypoxia that induces cancer regrowth and poor delivery of the anti-tumor agents. The main objective of this review is to focus on vascular disruption agents therapy, novel molecules, new ways to overcome therapy resistance to them, current clinical status and, especially, the upcoming challenges and applications of these molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.