ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Topical Probiotics as a Novel Approach in the Treatment of Chronic Dermatoses Associated with Skin Dysbiosis: A Narrative Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Gut-Brain-Skin Axis: Systemic Effects of Functional Ingredients in Healthy Skin Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Actinic Keratosis at the Crossroads of Inflammation and Cutaneous Dysbiosis.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor: potential use as a therapeutic strategy for viral infections.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Ex vivo Evaluation of Live-MB2 and CX-2 Biotic Strains on Inflammatory and Barrier-Related Biomarkers in a Human Skin Atopic Dermatitis-Like Model.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Emerging Microbiome-Based Therapies for Skin Infections: From Probiotics and Prebiotics to Synthetic Microbiome Engineering.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The skin microbiome plays a pivotal role in maintaining skin homeostasis, immune regulation, and barrier integrity. Dysbiosis, characterized by altered diversity and function of the microflora, contributes to the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory dermatoses such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, acne vulgaris, hidradenitis suppurativa, rosacea, and photoaging. This narrative review, based on searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, summarizes current evidence on the role of topical probiotics in the prevention and management of inflammatory dermatoses, drawing mainly on studies from the past decade and, where relevant, earlier works published between 1975 and 2025. Evidence indicates that topical probiotics modulate local immune responses, enhance antimicrobial peptide synthesis, inhibit pathogenic microorganism colonization, and support skin barrier regeneration. Additional benefits include accelerated wound healing and reduced environmental damage. However, study results are heterogeneous, and designs vary, with limited data on long-term effects, particularly in paediatric and immunosuppressed populations. Topical probiotics are a promising therapeutic approach for chronic inflammatory dermatoses linked to microbiota dysbiosis. They can restore microbial balance, support barrier function, suppress pathogenic microorganisms, and promote skin regeneration. Despite consistent reports of clinical improvement and improved cutaneous defence mechanisms, small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and the absence of standardized dosing regimens limit current evidence. Long-term safety data are limited, especially for vulnerable patient groups. Rigorous randomized controlled trials with standardized protocols and larger, diverse populations are needed to confirm efficacy, ensure safety, and guide clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.