ArticleNutrients2025
Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Subclinical Cardiac Biomarkers: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of U.S. Adults in NHANES 2001-2004.
Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesUltra-processed food consumption has been shown to be linked with clinical cardiovascular disease. This study aims to examine the associations of ultra-processed food consumption with biomarkers for subclinical-level myocardial damage [high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and T (hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT)] and myocardial stretch (NT-proBNP) in U.S. adults.
methodsWe used data from 6615 U.S. adults aged ≥20 years without prevalent cardiovascular disease from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2004. We identified ultra-processed food by applying the Nova classification to dietary recall data, and we divided participants into quartiles based on their consumption, expressed as a proportion of total daily energy (%kcal) and gram intakes (%grams). We defined elevated cardiac biomarkers as hs-cTnI > 12 ng/L in men and >10 ng/L in women, hs-cTnT ≥ 14 ng/L for all participants, and NT-proBNP ≥ 125 pg/mL for age < 75 y and ≥450 pg/mL for age ≥ 75 y. We used multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for socio-demographic, total energy intake, behavioral, and clinical characteristics.
resultsHigher ultra-processed food intake in %grams was associated with elevated NT-proBNP [odds ratio (OR) for quartile 4 vs. 1: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.00-1.61] when socio-demographic characteristics and total energy intake were adjusted for, but this was not the case with hs-cTnI or hs-cTnT. Further adjusting for clinical characteristics attenuated the association with NT-proBNP (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.61). There was no consistent association between ultra-processed food in %kcal and elevated NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, or hs-cTnI.
conclusionsUltra-processed food consumption is associated with subclinical myocardial stretch, a precursor to early heart failure. This supports the potential risks of subclinical cardiovascular disease associated with consuming ultra-processed food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.