Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41156697›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2025

The Role of Microbes in Ensiling.

Olli H Tuovinen, Seppo I Niemelä, Päivi J Rajala-Schultz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olli H TuovinenDepartment of Microbiology, Ohio State University, 484 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4601-4013
Seppo I NiemeläDepartment of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, Division of Microbiology, Biocenter Viikki, Helsinki University, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Päivi J Rajala-SchultzDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Helsinki University, Paroninkuja 20, 04920 Saarentaus, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4813-5097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensiling is the microbial processing of forage, based on the fermentation of plant sap that acidifies the silage to pH < 5. This acidity threshold prevents microbial activity that could otherwise produce inhibitory, toxic, malodorous or otherwise undesired metabolites. Anaerobic conditions are key to silage production and storage in silos because aerobic exposure would change the microbiota to counterproductive metabolism. This review outlines the principal microbial groups involved in the open ensiling process and discusses some additive effects with externally added compounds that have been used in this industry to enhance anaerobiosis, lactic acid fermentation, preservation, and safe storage. The ensiling process and the type of forage in the silage may impact methanogenesis in ruminants, and additional effects on ruminal digestion have also been reported.

Indexed as

ensilinglactic acid bacteriamycotoxinspathogenssilage

Identifiers

PMID41156697
PMCPMC12565874

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.