ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Vitamin D as an Immune Modulator in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Narrative Review.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disease in which environmental factors modulate genetically determined immune dysregulation. Vitamin D has emerged as a plausible modifier of disease expression because its active metabolite signals through the vitamin D receptor on innate and adaptive immune cells and influences antigen presentation, cytokine balance, and lymphocyte differentiation. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on vitamin D status and supplementation in SLE with attention to organ-specific domains. Observational studies consistently report high rates of hypovitaminosis D in SLE and associations with less favorable clinical profiles, including higher global and renal disease activity, adverse cardiometabolic features, greater infection vulnerability, and neuropsychiatric manifestations. Preclinical models demonstrate neuroprotective and barrier-stabilizing actions of vitamin D analogs, supporting biological plausibility. Interventional trials indicate that supplementation safely corrects deficiency and shows signals of benefit for selected outcomes (e.g., modest activity reductions or fatigue in specific contexts), although effects on interferon signatures, complement, and autoantibodies are heterogeneous and often limited. Overall, current evidence supports optimization of vitamin D status as a low-risk adjunct in comprehensive SLE care while highlighting the need for adequately powered, organ-focused randomized trials using standardized measurements and prespecified endpoints to define causality, therapeutic targets, and long-term safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.