ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capillary Malformation-Arteriovenous Malformation Syndrome Associated with RASA1 and EPHB4 Mutations: Comparative Case Series and Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pediatric heart failure in the era of cardio-immunology: inflammatory-immune context phenotypes, diagnosis, and targeted management.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A randomized controlled trial of electrical cardiometry-guided perioperative hemodynamic management in children undergoing cardiac surgery.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemodynamic monitoring is essential in the postoperative management of neonates undergoing cardiac surgery, enabling early identification of circulatory failure and its underlying cause, optimization of oxygen delivery to tissues, and evaluation of treatment response. Despite its significant role, there is still no consensus and there remains substantial heterogeneity in bedside hemodynamic monitoring practices. Pediatric intensivists typically rely on macro- and microcirculatory indicators, including arterial blood pressure, urine output, capillary refill time, mixed venous oxygen saturation, lactate concentration, and serial echocardiographic evaluations. However, most of these are indirect hemodynamic indicators and provide only intermittent snapshots of the hemodynamic status, which can be very fluctuating following cardiac surgery. Technological advancements have driven a shift toward continuous, noninvasive monitoring techniques, such as near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), electrical biosensing technology, and microcirculatory assessment tools. Real-time, simultaneous tracking of multiple physiological variables through a multimodal hemodynamic monitoring protocol facilitates the understanding of systemic and regional perfusion and oxygenation. This narrative review aims to summarize current techniques and innovations in neonatal hemodynamic monitoring following cardiac surgery, combining clinical evaluation with both intermittent and continuous noninvasive techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.