ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimizing Detection Reliability in Safety-Critical Computer Vision: Transfer Learning and Hyperparameter Tuning with Multi-Task Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a methodological framework for selectively optimizing computer vision models for safety-critical applications. Through systematic processes of hyperparameter tuning alongside multitask learning, we attempt to create a highly interpretable system to better assess the dangers of models intended for safety operations and intentionally select their trade-offs. Using thermographic images of a specific imitation explosive, we create a case study for the viability of humanitarian demining operations. We hope to demonstrate how this approach provides a developmental framework for creating humanitarian AI systems that optimize safety verification in real-world scenarios. By employing a comprehensive grid search across 64 model configurations to evaluate how loss function weights impact detection reliability, with particular focus on minimizing false negative rates due to their operational impact. The optimized configuration achieves a 37.5% reduction in false negatives while improving precision by 2.8%, resulting in 90% detection accuracy with 92% precision. However, to expand the generalizability of this model, we hope to call institutions to openly share their data to increase the breadth of imitation landmines and terrain data to train models from.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.