ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Sensitivity Analysis of Localized Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Towards Tomography-on-a-Chip.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrical impedance measurements are traditionally macroscopic screening techniques designed to obtain information about the macroscopic internal structure of biological systems. In order to overcome the limitations that the technology detects, mainly with the bulk properties, a miniaturization is employed by developing a complex microfluidic system to achieve cell-scale information. In this work, a microelectrode array was incorporated into a microfluidic chip, allowing localized Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) measurements, providing impedance data obtained in the spatial and frequency domains simultaneously. The height of the capillary in the microfluidic system was also systematically modified; hence, three types of channels with heights of 10 μm, 30 μm, and 50 μm were developed and studied. The EIS data collection was implemented using two different strategies (two- and four-electrode techniques). Sensitivity analysis was conducted using a microbead solution, where the linear mapping of the number of microbeads along the channel was achieved by EIS. Based on the findings, a complete overview of each measurement implementation was obtained, which is well explained by the physical background presented in the paper. In the case where the capillary height (10 μm) is comparable to the diameter of the microbeads (6 μm), the four-electrode technique detected the beads in a wider frequency range (approximately between 500 Hz and 50 kHz), while the two-electrode technique detected the beads in a narrower frequency range (approximately between 30 kHz and 300 kHz) with correlation greater than 0.9. In all other cases, a medium (or weak) correlation was found between the impedance data and the longitudinal bead distribution. Based on the results, the technology is ready for further development and adaptation for cell culture purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.