ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Construction and effectiveness assessment of the health education system for outpatient chronic respiratory diseases based on visualized intelligent healthcare.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic respiratory diseases significantly impact patients' quality of life and health outcomes. Health literacy was pivotal for effective disease management. This study evaluated the efficacy of a visual intelligent medical health education (VIMHE) model versus routine health education (RHE) on health literacy, pulmonary function, and quality of life in patients with chronic respiratory conditions. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was performed involving 139 patients aged 40-70 years with stable chronic respiratory diseases admitted to our hospital between January and December 2023. Participants were divided into two groups: the RHE Group (n=68) and the VIMHE Group (n=71). Health literacy was assessed using the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), Health Literacy Survey-European Union (HLS-EU), and Electronic Health Literacy Scale (eHEALS). Pulmonary function tests and Short Form 36 (SF-36) Quality of Life assessments were performed pre- and post-intervention. Results: The VIMHE Group demonstrated significantly higher health literacy scores across all metrics compared to the RHE Group: NVS (5.2±0.6 Conclusions: The VIMHE model significantly enhances health literacy, pulmonary function, and quality of life in patients with chronic respiratory diseases compared to RHE. Implementing VIMHE may improve patient outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.