Evidence mapPaperPMID 41158409Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

Development of a prognostic prediction signature for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis by integrating multiple programmed cell death-related genes and machine learning algorithms.

Jingyang Sun, Rongxuan Jiang, Meng Li, Qian Zhai, Niuniu Dong, Huanhuan Dong, Guangjian Zhang, Yanpeng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jingyang Sun *Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Rongxuan Jiang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Meng Li *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Qian ZhaiDepartment of Anesthesiology & Center for Brain Science, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Niuniu DongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Huanhuan DongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Guangjian ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yanpeng ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4975-4418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic progressive lung disease with a poor prognosis, severely limits patient survival. Various forms of programmed cell death (PCD) play significant roles in the progression of IPF. However, research on the comprehensive effects of different PCD patterns on the prognosis of IPF is still insufficient. This study aims to integrate multiple PCD-related genes to construct a prognostic model for IPF, providing new insights for individualized clinical prognosis assessment and facilitating more precise therapeutic strategies. Methods: This study used multiple machine learning analysis methods, multiple datasets, and integrated 16 types of PCD related genes for prognostic signature construction in IPF. The infiltration of different immune cell types in IPF samples was also assessed. The model's predictive performance was evaluated through validation with external datasets. Finally, on the basis of the selected key genes, potential drugs for IPF were identified using the Broad Institute's Connectivity Map databases. Results: Differential analysis of five Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets identified 1,491 PCD-related hub genes. Integration with overall survival (OS) data revealed 241 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) prognostic for IPF. Key PCD types included apoptosis, immunogenic cell death, necrosis, necroptosis, and ferroptosis. Functional enrichment highlighted DEG involvement in cell death/apoptosis and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways like apoptosis, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and NF-κB signaling. Using machine learning and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, seven prognostic biomarkers (TLR2, PDCD1LG2, AKT3, SLC1A4, ANTXR2, HTRA1, and TIMP1) were identified. The derived cell death score (CDS) effectively stratified high- and low-risk patients in training (GSE70866) and validation (GSE70867) cohorts [the area under the curve (AUC) >0.75]. A CDS-based nomogram demonstrated high prognostic accuracy (max AUC =0.907). Immune analysis revealed B cell enrichment in IPF and significant monocyte/activated natural killer (NK) cell infiltration in high-risk patients, correlating with worse OS. Screening identified 25 potential therapeutic small molecules [e.g., acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and histone deacetylase (HDAC)]. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) validation in a bleomycin-induced mouse model confirmed differential expression of the seven model genes, aligning with transcriptomic predictions. Conclusions: The prognostic signature based on PCD-related genes provides new biomarkers for the prognostic assessment of IPF, and has high predictive accuracy. Additionally, the identified potential drugs offer new directions for the treatment of IPF, laying the foundation for future individualized therapies.

Indexed as

biomarkersidiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)Programmed cell death (PCD)

Identifiers

PMID41158409
PMCPMC12557667

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.