ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Real-world safety of ixekizumab: a disproportionality analysis using the FDA adverse event reporting system and the VigiAccess databases.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ixekizumab is a biologic agent primarily indicated for the treatment of moderate to-severe plaque psoriasis. This study aimed to evaluate the post-marketing safety profile of ixekizumab by analyzing adverse event (AE) reports retrieved from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and VigiAccess databases. Methods: Four disproportionality analysis methods were employed in this study to detect positive signals associated with ixekizumab, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of the findings. Additionally, the time to onset of AEs was further analyzed. Results: In the FAERS databases and VigiAccess databases, 72,847 AE reports in total. Commonly reported AEs included injection site reactions, hypersensitivity reactions, fungal infections, upper respiratory tract infections, and inflammatory bowel disease. In addition, several unexpected AEs were identified, such as cellulitis, ear infection, bronchitis, herpes zoster, tooth infection, diverticulitis, kidney infection, and gastroenteritis viral. Sensitivity analysis further confirmed the robustness of these findings. Notably, 41.1% of the AEs occurred within the first month after treatment initiation. Discussion: This study confirmed several known AEs and identified some unexpected AEs, providing preliminary safety insights to guide clinicians in the safe use of ixekizumab in clinical practice. It is important to note that findings from spontaneous adverse event reporting systems are hypothesis-generating and may be limited by underreporting, variable reporting quality, and confounding factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.