ArticleERJ open research2025
Engagement and outcomes of virtual antenatal asthma care: a randomised controlled tele-trial.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Access, availability and engagement of optimal asthma management are limited in maternity care. This study evaluated the engagement and outcomes of a virtual model of antenatal asthma care compared to a face-to-face model. Methods: This parallel-group, assessor-blinded tele-trial recruited 200 pregnant women (mean age±sd 29.8±5.4 years) with asthma from the antenatal clinics of John Hunter Hospital, Australia, and randomised them to receive asthma care Results: Significantly more patients engaged with virtual asthma care than face-to-face care (78% Conclusion: A virtual model of antenatal asthma care significantly improved the engagement of pregnant women with the programme compared to a face-to-face model of care, and both models of care demonstrated clinical effectiveness.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.