ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Diabetes care for people experiencing homelessness in the UK: insights from a national survey of frontline professionals and the development of an integrated care model.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 'No Foot, No Future': Lived Experiences of Foot Health and Care Access Among Rough-Sleeping Adults in a UK Coastal Community-A Qualitative Study.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: People experiencing homelessness (PEH) face food insecurity, unstable housing and fragmented services that render conventional diabetes pathways unworkable and amplify complications. Methods: Between January and April 2024, we conducted a nationwide, cross-sectional mixed-methods survey of front-line professionals via NHS, inclusion-health and voluntary-sector networks, analysing quantitative data ( Results: Respondents comprised specialist diabetes clinicians (31%), homelessness/inclusion-health staff (38%) and VCSE providers (32%); median perceived Type 1 prevalence among PEH was 20% versus 8% nationally ( Discussion: Diabetes inequities among PEH stem chiefly from modifiable structural failures rather than patient non-adherence. The novel IHD-CMPH, anchored in outreach and mobile screening, provides a scalable framework to operationalise inclusion-health policy, improve glycaemic surveillance and avert avoidable admissions; this first national study translating multi-sector front-line evidence into a coherent policy model offers concrete levers for health-system reform and equity advancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.