ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Comparative effectiveness of empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) show promise in treating metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, the relative efficacy of different SGLT2is remains unclear. We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin in adults with MASLD. Methods: Using the TriNetX database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with MASLD who were newly prescribed either empagliflozin or dapagliflozin between January 2013 and September 2024. After propensity score matching, we compared 13,274 patients in each group. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause hospitalization, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), major adverse kidney events (MAKEs), and decompensated hepatic events. Secondary outcomes included each individual component of the primary outcome. Results: Empagliflozin was associated with a lower risk of primary composite outcomes compared to dapagliflozin (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.88). This benefit was consistent across most subgroups, including sex, presence of liver cirrhosis, heart failure, T2DM, and chronic kidney disease. Significant interactions were observed for age groups (p=0.04) and borderline for BMI categories (p=0.06). Empagliflozin also showed lower risks for all-cause hospitalization (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88), all-cause mortality (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.96), MACE (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99), and MAKE (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.86), but no difference in decompensated hepatic events (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.81-1.27). Conclusions: In patients with MASLD, empagliflozin was associated with better clinical outcomes compared to dapagliflozin, particularly in reducing cardiovascular and renal events, hospitalizations, and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.