ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025
Healthy dietary patterns and ovarian cancer risk and survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DASH, Mediterranean, and Plant-Based Diets and Cancer Risk in Women: A Narrative Review Based on Diet Quality Indices.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Plant-Based Diets and Ovarian Cancer Risk.Nutrients · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Studies investigating the associations between healthy dietary pattern and risk and survival of ovarian cancer have been limited and inconsistent. Therefore, we carried out this comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the available literature on the associations between healthy dietary patterns and risk and survival of ovarian cancer. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were comprehensively searched for the relevant articles published from databases inception to October 2024. According to heterogeneity, the pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the highest versus the lowest categories of healthy dietary patterns in relation to ovarian cancer risk and survival, using the random-effects or fixed-effects meta-analyses. Results: Sixteen studies (12 cohort and four case-control studies) with 615,203 participants, 5,452 ovarian cancer cases and 3,028 ovarian cancer deaths were included in the final analysis. Combining 15 effect sizes from eight studies, we found the evidence of a reduced risk of ovarian cancer in the highest compared with the lowest categories of healthy dietary patterns (RR = 0.91; 95%CI: 0.85-0.98, Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that high adherence to the healthy dietary patterns was associated with a reduced risk and improved survival of ovarian cancer. Future large-scale prospective studies are required to confirm and strengthen these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.