ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2026
[Herbal treatment options for post-viral symptoms and long COVID].
Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong COVID and post-viral symptom complexes have become a significant focus in medical practice. There is an urgent need to provide evidence-based treatment options to those patients. The aim of the literature review was to summarize herbal medicinal products as a treatment option for post-viral conditions, particularly long COVID.
methodsA working group of the Austrian Society for Phytotherapy conducted a narrative review between 2022 and 2024, based on external literature from the PubMed, PubPharm and Scopus databases and clinical experience from practice. The review identified the most relevant medicinal plants and their preparations for the most common symptom complexes of long COVID.
resultsA total of 98 publications and 24 monographs were included in the literature review. The symptom complexes (+ relevant phytopharmaceuticals) include neurological complaints, such as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) (Ginseng radix, Panax quinquefolii radix, Eleutherocci radix, Rhodiolae rhizoma et radix, Schisandrae fructus), nootropics (Ginkgo folium, Lavandulae flos), irritations of the respiratory tract (Liquiritiae radix, Nigellae semen, Eucalypti folium), gastrointestinal complaints (Gentianae radix, Centauri herba, Artemisii herba, Galangae rhizoma, Zingiberis rhizoma, Boswellia serrata, Curcuma longae rhizoma), circulatory weakness (Crataegi folium cum flore, Rosmarini folium, Salviae officinalis folium) and loss of smell (Rosae flos, Citri pericarpium, Caryophylli flos, Eucalypti folium). External evidence and clinical experience in medical practice show that many important symptoms of post-viral conditions can be successfully treated with herbal preparations.
conclusionPhytopharmaceuticals can provide evidence-based support for the therapeutic portfolio for viral diseases and their consequences in current and future viral epidemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.