ArticleGlobal spine journal2026
Evaluation of MRI-Based Region-specific Vertebral Bone Quality Score for Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar Fusion Surgery.
Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fragility fracture risk prediction using quantitative magnetic resonance and Vertebral Bone Quality scoring beyond density.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignRetrospective study.ObjectivesTo compare region-specific VBQ scores and to evaluate their effectiveness in assessing bone quality in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases.MethodsThis study retrospectively included patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases between April 2021 and January 2025. Region-specific VBQ scores (VBQ-anterior, VBQ-classic and VBQ-posterior), assessed using preoperative MRI. Hounsfield Unit (HU) values were also recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to assess the diagnostic accuracy. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the associations between region-specific VBQ scores, HU values, and lumbar T-scores.ResultsA total of 329 eligible patients was included. VBQ-anterior demonstrated the highest scores, whereas VBQ-posterior exhibited significantly lower values. Furthermore, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the three VBQ measurement approaches, as well as HU values, in identifying osteoporotic patients. The results revealed that HU values showed the highest area under the curve (AUC = 0.857), followed by VBQ-posterior (AUC = 0.825). In contrast, VBQ-anterior exhibited the lowest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.735). Correlation analysis demonstrated that HU values had the strongest correlation with lumbar T-scores (r = 0.57,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.