ArticleAorta (Stamford, Conn.)2025
Full Blood Count and its Differentials in Acute Aortic Dissection: An Update and Future Perspectives.
Article in Aorta (Stamford, Conn.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a potentially lethal condition with a high rate of misdiagnosis during the initial evaluation. In addition to established clinical variables, previous studies have consistently demonstrated a relationship between full blood count (FBC) and its various differentials with acute aortic syndromes, even identifying patients with worse outcome. Although FBC is a simple, inexpensive and routinely performed test, it is easily overlooked by clinicians. However, nearly all components of FBC, including white blood count, red blood cells, and platelets, may contribute to the underlying pathogenesis of AAD and therefore, we should fully explore and pinpoint precisely their potential diagnostic or prognostic performances. Herein, we summarize the results of such studies and discuss controversies regarding utility in future clinical practice.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.