ArticleNeurological research and practice2025
Recent intake of direct oral anticoagulants and acute ischemic stroke: real world data from a comprehensive stroke center.
Article in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heparin-calibrated anti-factor Xa activity as a surrogate marker for direct oral anticoagulant levels in acute stroke care: a large observational single-center study.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Author response to Sinha, "Comment on "Intracranial hemorrhage after ischemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants: Results from a prospective observational study"".Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Comment on "intracranial hemorrhage after ischemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants: results from a prospective observational study".Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Intracranial hemorrhage after ischemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants: results from a prospective observational study.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Letter to the editor regarding "Safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with direct oral anticoagulation: experience from a German stroke center" by Mers et al.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Letter to the editor regarding "Recent intake of direct oral anticoagulants and acute ischemic stroke: real world data from a comprehensive stroke center" by Pommeranz et al.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- AI-assisted hemorrhage detection following endovascular stroke treatment: a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Acute ischemic stroke or TIA despite DOAC treatment: the contribution of DOAC plasma levels to understand pathophysiological mechanisms.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke after recent direct oral anticoagulant intake: toward evidence-informed care.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeciding on intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with reported recent direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) intake remains challenging due to concerns about hemorrhagic risk and the absence of randomized controlled trial evidence. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive characterization of all AIS patients with reported recent DOAC intake-regardless of IVT eligibility-treated at a comprehensive stroke center that routinely measures calibrated anti-facor IIa/Xa activity at admission.
methodsIn this retrospective study, clinical and procedural data from AIS patients with recent DOAC intake and calibrated anti-factor IIa/Xa activity measured within three hours of admission were analyzed. Patients were treated at the University Hospital Essen between March 2017 and October 2023.
resultsAmong 469 included patients, anti-factor IIa/Xa activity was ≤ 30 ng/ml in 28%, > 30- ≤ 50 ng/ml in 9%, > 50- ≤ 75 ng/ml in 9%, > 75- ≤ 100 ng/ml in 9% and > 100 ng/ml in 45%. Lower DOAC levels correlated with severe stroke symptoms at admission (ρ = - 0.263, p < 0.001). IVT was administered to 33.5% of patients with DOAC levels ≤ 50 ng/ml, compared to only 4% among those with levels > 50 ng/ml, the majority of whom received prior reversal with idarucizumab. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) occurred in 4% of IVT-treated and 1% of non-IVT-treated patients, without association to anticoagulation status.
conclusionsA considerable proportion of AIS patients with recent DOAC intake exhibited minimal or no anticoagulant activity at presentation. Those with the lowest levels also showed highest stroke severity. IVT was safe across all DOAC level groups, with low and comparable sICH rates. These findings support the rationale for a randomized trial evaluating IVT without prior DOAC level testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.