ArticlemAbs2025
Monoclonal antibody formulations: a quantitative analysis of marketed products and patents.
Article in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the approval of OKT3® in 1986, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become a cornerstone of modern therapeutics. However, their complex physicochemical properties pose challenges, particularly for high-concentration formulation and subcutaneous administration. Excipient selection is crucial for maintaining mAb stability and efficacy, yet existing studies often lack systematic, cross-source analyses. This study integrates data from marketed products and patents to investigate formulation trends and excipient preferences. Data were retrieved from the Drugs@FDA databases, CAS Formulations Database and Derwent Innovation as of December 31, 2024. Extracted information included target, indication, dosage form, route of administration, and formulation composition. The associations between formulation-related factors (e.g., antibody concentration, route of administration) and excipient selection were evaluated using proportion tests. A total of 6,119 patent records and 108 marketed mAb products (covering 388 patented and 141 marketed formulations) were analyzed. Proportion tests revealed significant associations between antibody concentration and the use of histidine (marketed
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.