ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025
ADHD diagnostic tools across ages: traditional and digital approaches.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a narrative review of current approaches to the diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children and adults. We place particular attention on recent technological advancements. ADHD diagnosis traditionally relies on a combination of subjective rating scales, clinician interviews, and observational data. In recent years, objective tools have emerged, including computerized neuropsychological tests and biometric measures. Examples include electroencephalography and eye tracking. Their clinical utility remains under investigation. This review explores these developments, including the integration of virtual reality environments and machine learning algorithms into diagnostic processes. We synthesize findings from diverse sources. The review highlights both established and emerging tools and the age-group differences in diagnostic challenges. We also note the potential of immersive and data-driven technologies to improve accuracy. Rather than applying a systematic methodology, this narrative review aims to capture current directions and preliminary insights that can inform future research hand practice. We reviewed recent research on ADHD diagnosis across age groups, with a focus on virtual reality and machine learning. We found that these tools showed modest accuracy improvements and better reflection of real-world setting, though studies were generally small and diverse. These findings suggest that VR-ML systems could develop into practical and explainable decision-support tools for everyday ADHD diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.