Evidence mapPaperPMID 41164091Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025

ADHD diagnostic tools across ages: traditional and digital approaches.

Marina Knyazhansky, Tammar Shrot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marina KnyazhanskyDepartment of Software Engineering, Shamoon College of Engineering, Ashdod, Israel.
Tammar ShrotDepartment of Software Engineering, Shamoon College of Engineering, Ashdod, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a narrative review of current approaches to the diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children and adults. We place particular attention on recent technological advancements. ADHD diagnosis traditionally relies on a combination of subjective rating scales, clinician interviews, and observational data. In recent years, objective tools have emerged, including computerized neuropsychological tests and biometric measures. Examples include electroencephalography and eye tracking. Their clinical utility remains under investigation. This review explores these developments, including the integration of virtual reality environments and machine learning algorithms into diagnostic processes. We synthesize findings from diverse sources. The review highlights both established and emerging tools and the age-group differences in diagnostic challenges. We also note the potential of immersive and data-driven technologies to improve accuracy. Rather than applying a systematic methodology, this narrative review aims to capture current directions and preliminary insights that can inform future research hand practice. We reviewed recent research on ADHD diagnosis across age groups, with a focus on virtual reality and machine learning. We found that these tools showed modest accuracy improvements and better reflection of real-world setting, though studies were generally small and diverse. These findings suggest that VR-ML systems could develop into practical and explainable decision-support tools for everyday ADHD diagnosis.

Indexed as

ADHD diagnosisecological validitylifespan assessmentmachine learningvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41164091
PMCPMC12560001

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.