Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41164368›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Renal hyperfiltration with and without metabolic syndrome: differential implications for cardiovascular events, kidney failure, and mortality.

Yu Ho Lee, Dae Kyu Kim, Jin Sug Kim, Su Jin Jeong, Kyung Hwan Jeong, Hyeon Seok Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu Ho Lee *Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dae Kyu Kim *Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Sug KimDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Su Jin JeongStatistics Support Part, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Hwan JeongDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyeon Seok HwangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Renal hyperfiltration (RHF) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) share common pathophysiology and are both associated with adverse clinical outcomes. However, their combined impact remains unclear. Methods: In total, 278,552 propensity score-matched individuals were enrolled in the Korean National Health Insurance Service database (2009-2011). Participants were divided into four groups based on RHF and MetS status, and cardiovascular (CV) events, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) progression, and all-cause mortality were evaluated. Results: Compared to non-MetS with normal renal filtration (NRF), MetS with NRF was associated with a significant increase in the risk of CV events, which was further amplified when combined with RHF (adjusted HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.35-1.55, P for interaction = 0.047). Patients with RHF exhibited more pronounced increases in the HRs for CV events than those with NRF as the number of dysfunctional metabolic components increased (P for interaction = 0.019). The risk of ESKD progression was not increased in non-MetS with RHF; however, it was significantly higher in patients with MetS alone and highest in those with both MetS and RHF (adjusted HR = 3.23, 95% CI = 1.61-6.47). The risk of all-cause mortality was elevated in patients with RHF or MetS alone and highest in those with both RHF and MetS (adjusted HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.31-1.52). Conclusion: The clinical significance of RHF differs based on MetS status, with their coexistence posing the highest risk for CV events, ESKD progression, and all-cause mortality. A synergistic interaction between RHF and MetS was evident in the risk of CV events.

Indexed as

all-cause mortalitycardiovascular eventend-stage kidney diseasemetabolic syndromerenal hyperfiltration

Identifiers

PMID41164368
PMCPMC12558771

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.