Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Ecology and evolution · 2026
Article
Ecology and evolution · 2025
Article
4 · The record
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Lang ShenAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of the Conservation and Exploitation of Biological Resources, College of Life Sciences Anhui Normal University Wuhu Anhui China.
Hai-Jun MaInstitute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences (Nanjing Botanical Garden Mem. Sun Yat-Sen) Nanjing China.
Wei-Qi MengInnovative Research Team for Forest Restoration Mechanisms, Chishui National Ecological Quality Comprehensive Monitoring Stations, Nanjing, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China (MEE) Nanjing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9839-1959
Lu-Jing WangAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of the Conservation and Exploitation of Biological Resources, College of Life Sciences Anhui Normal University Wuhu Anhui China.
Rong-Bin WangInstitute of Chinese Medicine Resources Anhui College of Traditional Chinese Medicine Wuhu Anhui China.
Xiang WangAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of the Conservation and Exploitation of Biological Resources, College of Life Sciences Anhui Normal University Wuhu Anhui China.
Wan-Zeng WangAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of the Conservation and Exploitation of Biological Resources, College of Life Sciences Anhui Normal University Wuhu Anhui China.
Guo-Sheng LvAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of the Conservation and Exploitation of Biological Resources, College of Life Sciences Anhui Normal University Wuhu Anhui China.
Jian-Wen ShaoAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of the Conservation and Exploitation of Biological Resources, College of Life Sciences Anhui Normal University Wuhu Anhui China.
Kun LiuAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of the Conservation and Exploitation of Biological Resources, College of Life Sciences Anhui Normal University Wuhu Anhui China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4553-0606
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.