ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
The Influence of Implant Surface Treatments on Osseointegration: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Osseointegration of dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from preclinical animal models and human studies.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Pooled it
- Osseointegration of implant with various surface treatments.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Osseointegration is crucial for the long-term success of dental implants. Various surface treatments have been developed to enhance the biological interaction between the implant and bone tissue. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different surface modifications on osseointegration. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 60 participants, who were randomly divided into three groups. Group A were treated with acid-etched implants, Group B were treated with titanium plasma-sprayed implants, and Group C were treated with untreated implants. Key parameters measured included the osseointegration rate, implant stability, and the bone-to-implant contact percentage. Results: Statistically significant differences in osseointegration were observed among the groups. Group A showed the highest osseointegration rate, followed by Group B, with Conclusion: Acid-etched surfaces demonstrated superior osseointegration, suggesting that surface modification can enhance implant success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.