ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Validation of the orthostatic hypotension knowledge, attitudes, and practices questionnaire and investigation of influencing factors: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to develop and validate tools to assess inpatients' knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning orthostatic hypotension (OH) and to explore the influencing factors. Design: This study was a cross-sectional validation study conducted from July to December 2024. Methods: This research employed a cross-sectional study design, in which the OH knowledge, attitudes, and practices questionnaire (KAPQ) was administered to hospitalized patients. The Delphi expert consultation, Spearman correlation analysis and factor analysis were used to evaluate and validate the questionnaire. The current status and influencing factors of patients' KAPQ scores were subsequently analyzed. Results: Of the 1,488 patients who completed the validated questionnaire, 12.77% experienced OH in the hospital. The KAPQ had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.97, with exploratory factor analysis revealing three factors explaining 74% of its variance. The item-total correlations for the KAPQ ranged from 0.55 to 0.82. Test-retest reliability was evaluated with a Spearman rank correlation coefficient of 0.89. Individuals with a college education or higher had a lower risk of low KAPQ scores than did those with a high school education or less (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55-0.82). Receiving health education on OH also reduced the risk of low scores (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.30-0.45). Additionally, a higher FES-I score was linked to a decreased risk of low KAPQ scores (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99). Conclusion: The self-reported KAPQ scale demonstrated robust reliability and validity coefficients, effectively assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding OH among inpatients. Inpatients who had received health education related to OH, had higher FES-I scores, possessed higher educational levels, and achieved comparatively elevated KAPQ scores concerning OH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.