Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41165895›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical systems2025

Describing the Performance and the Infrastructure Requirements of the Existing Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) Screening Algorithms for Diabetic Patients: an Umbrella Review.

Rachel Kabunga, Justus Asasira, Sheilah Njuki, Atwine Daniel, Katharine Morley, Michael Morley, Fred Kaggwa, Justin C Cikomola, Arunga Simon

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel KabungaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda. rkabunga@must.ac.ug.
Justus AsasiraDepartment of Community Engagement and Service Learning, Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Sheilah NjukiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Atwine DanielDepartment of Clinical Research, Soar Research Foundation, Mbarara, Uganda.
Katharine MorleyDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Global Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael MorleyHarvard Ophthalmology AI Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Fred KaggwaDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Justin C CikomolaFaculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Arunga SimonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AI-based diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening algorithms have been evaluated in many countries and have shown promise in expanding access to screening, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the literature lacks guidance on which algorithms are best suited for these settings. This umbrella review summarizes current evidence on the performance, infrastructure needs, and global implementation of AI-based DR screening tools. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) guidelines, systematic reviews were identified through searches in PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar up to April 18, 2024. Eligible studies were reviewed, and findings were presented in tables and graphics. Twenty systematic reviews were included. Most algorithms were developed, validated, and used in high-income countries, with none developed or implemented in Africa. More than 400 algorithms were identified, of which 161 had some form of clinical validation, and 31 were validated in real-world settings. Sensitivity ranged from 66.0% to 100.0%, specificity from 59.5% to 98.7%, and AUROC from 87.8% to 99.1%. Only 12 algorithms have received regulatory approval, and 11 of them are currently used in clinical practice. AI-based DR screening models hold promise as diagnostic tools across diverse clinical settings, particularly where ophthalmic resources are limited. However, successful implementation depends on appropriate infrastructure, local validation, and regulatory support. Addressing the significant gaps in algorithm development and validation in Africa is essential to ensure equitable access and effective use of AI in DR screening.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDiabetic RetinopathyMass ScreeningHumansSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceDeep learning screeningDiabetic retinopathyMachine learningScreening

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.