SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Efficacy and safety of BRAF-MEK dual inhibition in BRAF-V600E mutated papillary craniopharyngioma: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular therapy for papillary craniopharyngioma: a multi-institutional analysis of practice patterns across the RAPID Consortium.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Systemic Molecularly Targeted Therapies for Neoadjuvant and Salvage Craniopharyngioma: A Contemporary Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePapillary craniopharyngioma (PCP) is a rare central nervous system tumor with high recurrence and significant morbidity. The BRAF V600E mutation has emerged as a potential target for treatment, with BRAF-MEK inhibitors showing promise in early studies. However, their efficacy and safety remain uncertain due to limited data from small-scale studies and case reports. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of dual BRAF-MEK inhibitor therapy in BRAF V600E-mutated PCP.
methodsA systematic search of OVID Medline, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of BRAF-MEK inhibitors in PCP were included. Due to the predominance of case reports, a narrative systematic review was performed without meta-analysis.
resultsTwenty-one studies involving 54 patients met inclusion criteria. Treatment was administered as neoadjuvant (n = 11), adjuvant (n = 34), or palliative (n = 9) settings. Most reports were case-based; two cohort studies (Brastianos et al., n = 16; De Alcubierre et al., n = 14) reported volumetric response rates of 93.8% and 92.9%, respectively. Common presenting symptoms included hypopituitarism (60.5%), visual changes (47.3%), and headache (44.7%). Median therapy duration was 5 months (range, 1.5-31); 6 months (3-16) for neoadjuvant, 4.5 months (1.5-21) for adjuvant and 7 months (2-31) for palliative use. Median tumor volume reduction was 89% overall (neoadjuvant 90%, adjuvant 85%, palliative 88%). Reported toxicities were generally manageable.
conclusionDual BRAF-MEK inhibition demonstrates robust tumor responses and a favorable safety profile across neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative settings in PCP. These preliminary findings support further investigation to define long-term efficacy, safety, and integration into clinical protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41165932What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.