ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025
Medication safety in patients with hepatic disease: proof of concept of a new approach to screen for patients at risk-a retrospective evaluation utilizing electronic prescribing systems.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHepatic impairment (HI) leads to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes demanding adjustment of drug therapy. To increase medication safety, hospital pharmacists need to quickly identify patients at risk. Laboratory parameters and liver scores are often available only with timely delay. Alternatively, screening for typical drugs used in severe HI in electronic prescribing systems could be an option.
aimTo test a new approach for the timely identification of patients with hepatic impairment. Drugs typically used in severe HI and its complications were evaluated as screening tools in patients with documented liver disease to identify patients who probably require drug adjustment to liver function.
methodPatients ≥ 18 years and hospitalized in the year 2022 with an ICD-10-GM coding for liver disease were identified retrospectively. ICD-10-GM classes of special interest, reflecting severe HI, were defined (K70 (alcoholic liver disease), K72 (hepatic failure) and K74 (liver fibrosis/cirrhosis)). Drugs typically used in severe hepatic impairment and its complications (index drugs) were defined as carvedilol, propranolol, lactulose, L-ornithin-L-aspartate, rifaximin, spironolactone and ursodeoxycholic acid. For all patients, use of index drugs according to the electronic prescribing system, laboratory liver parameters, MELD (Model of Endstage Liver Disease) and MELD 3.0 were documented. We analysed, how many patients and how many cases of hepatic ICD-10-GM-codes were identified by screening for index drugs.
resultOf 2319 patients with a hepatic ICD-10-GM-code in 2022, 2012 had electronic charts available. For these, 2916 main class ICD-10-GM codes were documented (4505 including main and sub-classes; median 1; IQR 1-3). Of 2012 patients, 1005 (50%) were treated with index drugs. Of the 2916 main ICD-10-GM classes, 1754 (60%) had index drugs, more often in codes of special interest (K74 82.5%, K70 79.7%, K72 68.9%). Patients in these main classes of special interest had higher MELD (median 14.8-18.2) and MELD 3.0 (18-22.9) compared to the overall patient cohort (MELD 12; MELD 3.0 15.9) and frequently laboratory liver parameters out of normal range.
conclusionScreening via index drugs typically used in hepatic impairment is a promising tool to identify patients at risk probably needing drug adjustment to hepatic function. Further studies need to determine the practical use of this tool to increase drug therapy safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41166055What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.