ArticlePloS one2025
Predicting hypertension and identifying most important factors among married women in Bangladesh using machine learning approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: Focus on Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning approaches to identify influential factors associated with hypertension and prehypertension among rural adults in Bangladesh.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Women's empowerment and health: nationwide insights on selected non-communicable conditions in Bangladesh.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHypertension is a leading contributor to maternal and cardiometabolic morbidity in Bangladesh. We developed and interpreted machine-learning (ML) models to predict hypertension and rank associated factors among married women with the goal of informing targeted screening and policy in low-resource settings.
methodsWe analyzed 4,253 married women from the nationally representative BDHS 2017-18 survey (hypertension prevalence: 23.1%). Twelve ML algorithms were trained under six class-balancing strategies with hyperparameters tuned via random search. Validation used a hold-out test set (80/20) and repeated stratified k-fold cross-validation; bootstrap confidence intervals were estimated for the selected model. Model performance was compared with parametric and non-parametric tests. To interpret results, SHAP was used to rank the top 20 predictors and visualize feature effects. Models quantify associations rather than causation.
resultsThe Extra Trees classifier with SMOTE+ENN achieved the best discrimination (F1 = 0.94; AUC-PR = 0.95; ROC-AUC = 0.95). Compared with the original imbalanced training, minority-class detection improved substantially (Extra Trees F1 increased from 0.08 to 0.94; recall from 0.04 to 0.95) while accuracy and ROC-AUC remained relatively stable across samplers. Statistical testing favored SMOTE+ENN for recall, F1, G-mean and AUC-PR. SHAP identified age, parity, recent births, contraceptive use, spousal education and BMI as key predictors. Younger age (<35 years) and normal/underweight status were protective, while parity ≥2-3, husbands' age ≥ 40 years and overweight/obesity increased risk.
conclusionsAn interpretable ensemble model built primarily on sociodemographic and behavioral variables supplemented by limited biometric markers (BMI, glucose) can accurately flag hypertensive risk among married women in Bangladesh. Findings support programmatic integration of risk scores into eRegistries, routine blood pressure checks in family planning and postpartum visits, husband-focused education/SMS interventions and prioritization of high-parity households in high-risk regions. External validation on BDHS-2022 is planned to assess generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.