ArticleEBioMedicine2025
AI-derived body composition analysis reveals muscle volume and metformin-associated adipose effects and the obesity paradox in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal computed tomography body composition changes in patients receiving curative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Multidimensional modeling and stratification of nutritional risk in non-small cell lung cancer based on artificial intelligence-derived CT body composition phenotypes.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBody composition is emerging as a prognostic factor in cancer, with metformin showing potential antitumour effects in patients with obesity and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to determine which specific body composition components drive survival differences in different patient subgroups and explore underlying molecular mechanisms.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we analysed 1275 patients with confirmed NSCLC diagnosis and available chest CT imaging for body composition analysis at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Six body composition parameters (muscle density and volume, visceral adipose tissue [VAT], subcutaneous adipose tissue [SAT], VAT/SAT ratio, and intramuscular adipose tissue [IMAT]) were quantified using validated CNN-based segmentation algorithms from baseline CT scans. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), assessed from diagnosis until death or last follow-up. Associations with OS were analysed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, followed by subgroup analyses by sex, BMI, diabetes, and metformin use. Circulating cytokine levels (n = 93) and oncogenic driver mutations (n = 646) from the imaging cohort and comprehensive tumour mutation profiles from an independent Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cohort (n = 5363) were analysed for mechanistic insights.
findingsMuscle volume demonstrated a dose-response relationship with OS (T2 vs. T1: HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.94; T3 vs. T1: HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.88) and the effect was intensified in patients with a BMI ≥25 kg/m
interpretationHigher muscle volume consistently predicts improved survival in patients with NSCLC, with enhanced effects in patients with elevated BMI or diabetes. Increased adipose tissue components benefit only metformin users, suggesting drug-specific metabolic interactions. Our work demonstrates the clinical utility of detailed body composition and suggests opportunities for personalised treatment approaches based on comprehensive body composition profiles rather than BMI alone.
fundingThis work was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health: U01CA209414 to X.W. and D.C.C., 1K99CA297010 to X.W.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.