ArticleScientific reports2025
Reduced postural stability in men and women aged 55-65 following 14 days of head-down bed rest.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aging and head-down bed rest (HDBR) decrease postural stability. Chances of being bedridden increase with age, but HDBR studies usually focus on young men. Here, we evaluate the impact of HDBR on postural stability among late middle-aged individuals. Twenty-two healthy participants (55-65 years old, 11 women) were exposed to 14-day HDBR. Eleven participants performed daily exercise. Static posturography data were collected before, 5 h after, and 4 weeks after HDBR. No time×group or time×sex effects were observed, but women had lower postural stability. With eyes open, the root mean square of the center of pressure was larger immediately after HDBR only in the medio-lateral axis (median [interquartile range]: +53% [+ 15%; +129%], p = 0.002). The mean velocity was increased on both axes (+ 20% [+ 8%; +46%] for medio-lateral and + 19% [+ 13%; +36%] for antero-posterior, both p < 0.001). The complexity features and the critical time were left unchanged. The effects of HDBR were more visible in the eyes open condition and the deconditioning was reversible after four weeks. 14-day HDBR decreased postural stability in individuals aged 55-65, with no impact of the chosen countermeasure. While the deconditioning was equivalent to two decades of aging for some features, additional research is required to determine whether age was an aggravating factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.