Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41168487›Full record

ArticleNature methods2025

Nicheformer: a foundation model for single-cell and spatial omics.

Alejandro Tejada-Lapuerta, Anna C Schaar, Robert Gutgesell, Giovanni Palla, Lennard Halle, Mariia Minaeva, Larsen Vornholz, Leander Dony, Francesca Drummer, Till Richter and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Spatium: A Protein Language Foundation Model for Spatial Proteomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. [Applications and Challenges of Deep Learning in Human Genome Research].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alejandro Tejada-Lapuerta *TUM School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Anna C Schaar *TUM School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Robert GutgesellInstitute of Computational Biology, Computational Health Center, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6137-0468
Giovanni PallaInstitute of Computational Biology, Computational Health Center, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Lennard HalleInstitute of Computational Biology, Computational Health Center, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9697-2896
Mariia MinaevaInstitute of Computational Biology, Computational Health Center, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7028-1264
Larsen VornholzInstitute of Computational Biology, Computational Health Center, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8054-5603
Leander DonyInstitute of Computational Biology, Computational Health Center, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5697-6991
Francesca DrummerInstitute of Computational Biology, Computational Health Center, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Till RichterTUM School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Mojtaba BahramiInstitute of Computational Biology, Computational Health Center, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0151-5196
Fabian J TheisTUM School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany. fabian.theis@helmholtz-munich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-1943

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue makeup depends on the local cellular microenvironment. Spatial single-cell genomics enables scalable and unbiased interrogation of these interactions. Here we introduce Nicheformer, a transformer-based foundation model trained on both human and mouse dissociated single-cell and targeted spatial transcriptomics data. Pretrained on SpatialCorpus-110M, a curated collection of over 57 million dissociated and 53 million spatially resolved cells across 73 tissues on cellular reconstruction, Nicheformer learns cell representations that capture spatial context. It excels in linear-probing and fine-tuning scenarios for a newly designed set of downstream tasks, in particular spatial composition prediction and spatial label prediction. Critically, we show that models trained only on dissociated data fail to recover the complexity of spatial microenvironments, underscoring the need for multiscale integration. Nicheformer enables the prediction of the spatial context of dissociated cells, allowing the transfer of rich spatial information to scRNA-seq datasets. Overall, Nicheformer sets the stage for the next generation of machine-learning models in spatial single-cell analysis.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsSingle-Cell AnalysisSoftwareAnimalsCellular MicroenvironmentGene Expression ProfilingHumansMachine LearningMiceTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID41168487
PMCPMC12695652

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.