Evidence mapPaperPMID 41168638Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2025

Sex and Gender-Based Differences in Outcomes of Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Alexis E McFeely, Vera A Bittner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexis E McFeelyHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Vera A BittnerDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, GSB 444, 521 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA. vbittner@uab.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis literature review summarizes recent interventions to enhance cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participation, enrollment, and completion among women and their impact on CR outcomes. RECENT FINDING: Despite well-documented benefits of CR, CR remains underutilized nationally and globally, more so among women than men. Barriers to CR participation reported by women have not changed significantly over time. Recent approaches to improving women's enrollment, adherence, and completion have included home-based CR and telerehabilitation, incorporation of more diverse exercise modalities, and women-focused or women-only CR programming. Despite some encouraging results, most approaches have shown only modest benefits, and study interpretation is often limited by small study sizes, a lack of randomization, and highly selected samples. CR remains underutilized among women, contributing to poor health outcomes. Novel approaches to CR show promise, but further research is necessary to evaluate their impact on cardiovascular events, physiologic outcomes, and quality of life.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationMyocardial InfarctionExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeSex FactorsTreatment OutcomeAcute myocardial infarctionCardiac rehabilitationGender gapSecondary preventionWomen-Focused cardiac rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41168638
PMCPMC12575514

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.