Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41168786›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2025

Exploration of biomaterial and stem cell-based strategies for promoting neuronal regeneration and creating engineered 3D in-vitro disease models.

Gopal Khodve, Sayani Banerjee, Mamta Kumari, Velayutham Ravichandiran, Sugato Banerjee, Subhadeep Roy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development of a Scaffold from the Cob ofJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gopal KhodveDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Chunilal Bhawan, 168 Maniktala Main Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India.
Sayani BanerjeeDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Chunilal Bhawan, 168 Maniktala Main Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India.
Mamta KumariDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India.
Velayutham RavichandiranDepartment of Natural Products, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Chunilal Bhawan, 168 Maniktala Main Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India.
Sugato BanerjeeDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Chunilal Bhawan, 168 Maniktala Main Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India.
Subhadeep RoyDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Chunilal Bhawan, 168 Maniktala Main Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India. subhadeeproy.good@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0805-2505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adult brain can produce only a relatively small number of new neurons, and neurogenesis occurs only in specific brain areas. Post-neuronal injury self-repair is very slow and sometimes does not occur. Therefore, advancements in regenerative therapies play an essential role in recovery from damage. This review focuses on stem cell-based neuronal repair by using biomaterials. We discuss neural tissue damage and the associated mechanisms in neuronal repair, highlighting the role of B cells along with VGLUT1/VGLUT2 (vesicular glutamate transporter 1/2) terminals and glutamate AMPA receptors, IL-1R1 signalling, and ERK/Stat6/MERTK Signalling. Furthermore, it focuses on the types of biomaterials, their characteristics, and mechanisms to overcome neuronal damage repair challenges using modern biomaterial-dependent neuronal tissue engineering techniques. Axonal regeneration can be enhanced by mixing many components (biomaterials, cells, and chemicals) to recover from neural nerve illnesses. Polymers, such as collagen, gelatin, chitosan, alginate, hyaluronan, silk fibroin, poly(L-lactic acid), poly(glycolic acid), polycaprolactone, polyphosphoester, and polyurethane, have been used to aid nerve cell growth. These polymers can be either natural or synthetic. Biomaterials that conduct electricity, such as polypyrrole, polythiophene, and polyaniline, can help neurites grow and make cells more active because they carry electrical impulses that help nerve signal travel. The primary goal of this review is to examine the current methods and uses of brain tissue engineering techniques, which include aspects of stem cell-based 3D in vitro and in vivo models, translational efforts, and challenges in clinical applications.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsModels, BiologicalNerve RegenerationNeuronsStem CellsTissue EngineeringAnimalsHumansBiocompatible Materials3D Microphysiological disease modelBiomaterialsNerve injuryNeural tissue engineeringNeuronal repairStem cell therapy

Identifiers

PMID41168786
PMCPMC12574274

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.