ReviewJournal of translational medicine2025
Exploration of biomaterial and stem cell-based strategies for promoting neuronal regeneration and creating engineered 3D in-vitro disease models.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Scaffold from the Cob ofJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Engineered IL1R1-CD3 Tregs modulate neuroimmune responses and attenuate neuropathic pain in a rat CCI model.Immunologic research · 2026Article
- Article
- The Extracellular Matrix, the Silent 'Architect' of Glioma.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Pharmacological effects and application prospects of mussel adhesive proteins.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adult brain can produce only a relatively small number of new neurons, and neurogenesis occurs only in specific brain areas. Post-neuronal injury self-repair is very slow and sometimes does not occur. Therefore, advancements in regenerative therapies play an essential role in recovery from damage. This review focuses on stem cell-based neuronal repair by using biomaterials. We discuss neural tissue damage and the associated mechanisms in neuronal repair, highlighting the role of B cells along with VGLUT1/VGLUT2 (vesicular glutamate transporter 1/2) terminals and glutamate AMPA receptors, IL-1R1 signalling, and ERK/Stat6/MERTK Signalling. Furthermore, it focuses on the types of biomaterials, their characteristics, and mechanisms to overcome neuronal damage repair challenges using modern biomaterial-dependent neuronal tissue engineering techniques. Axonal regeneration can be enhanced by mixing many components (biomaterials, cells, and chemicals) to recover from neural nerve illnesses. Polymers, such as collagen, gelatin, chitosan, alginate, hyaluronan, silk fibroin, poly(L-lactic acid), poly(glycolic acid), polycaprolactone, polyphosphoester, and polyurethane, have been used to aid nerve cell growth. These polymers can be either natural or synthetic. Biomaterials that conduct electricity, such as polypyrrole, polythiophene, and polyaniline, can help neurites grow and make cells more active because they carry electrical impulses that help nerve signal travel. The primary goal of this review is to examine the current methods and uses of brain tissue engineering techniques, which include aspects of stem cell-based 3D in vitro and in vivo models, translational efforts, and challenges in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.