Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41169271›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Dissociable effects of medication on visual-vestibular brain excitability by visual motion stimuli in episodic ataxia type 2.

Janina von der Gablentz, Andreas Sprenger, Nina Overbeeke, Dagmar Timmann, Norbert Brüggemann, Christoph Helmchen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janina von der GablentzDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-5923
Andreas SprengerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Nina OverbeekeDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Dagmar TimmannDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1935-416X
Norbert BrüggemannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Christoph HelmchenDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical hallmark of episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2) consists of episodes of recurrent severe vestibulo-cerebellar dysfunction, characterized by marked postural unsteadiness and oscillopsia. Triggering factors of EA2 attacks, such as physical exertion and sensory stimulation, the high comorbidity with migraine, and the increased risk of epilepsy in EA2 suggest abnormal brain excitability. To investigate this, we assessed brain excitability in response to visual (checkerboard) and visual motion (optic flow) stimuli using interictal functional magnetic resonance imaging. Visual stimulation elicited strong bilateral neural activity in the primary visual cortex (V1-V3) and in motion-sensitive visual areas (V5) in 21 EA2 patients and 21 age-matched healthy participants (HP). Compared to HP, EA2 patients revealed decreased activity in the primary visual cortex (V1), cerebellar Crus I and II and caudal vermis but increased activation of multisensory vestibular processing areas (posterior insula, superior temporal and supramarginal gyrus, inferior parietal lobe). Interestingly, the abnormal excitability in the vestibular processing cortex areas was primarily found in patients without medication (4-aminopyridine, acetazolamide) but hardly seen in patients on medication. Our findings in treatment-naïve patients reflect disease-inherent changes in visual cortical excitability in EA2, which may be reversible through anti-episodic medication. As excitability by visual motion stimuli in multi-sensory vestibular processing cortical areas was largely found in patients on medication it may also indicate an inhibitory effect on the physiological reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction as a multisensory mechanism for self-motion perception: the annoying oscillopsia of EA2 patients is counterbalanced by decreased visual cortex activity and hence smaller inhibition of the vestibular cortex.

Indexed as

episodic ataxia type 2fMRIvisual excitabilityvisual stimulationvisual–vestibular interaction

Identifiers

PMID41169271
PMCPMC12569760

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.