ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Diet quality and environmental impact of university students' food choices at a South African university.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping the Healthiness of Campus Food Environments in Nigeria: In-Store Retail and Outdoor Advertising Assessments at Selected Universities-The NigeFE Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: South Africa faces a triple burden of malnutrition. The country's food system, characterized by high consumption of resource-intensive animal and processed foods, contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Global policy frameworks increasingly emphasize sustainable diets, but national strategies and implementation efforts in South Africa are still emerging. The climate emergency has amplified global efforts to promote sustainability, yet the environmental impact of dietary choices remains underexplored in South Africa. This study examines diet quality and the environmental impact of food choices of students in a South African university, offering insights into sustainability from a young consumer perspective. Methods: Dietary data were collected using a repeated 24-h food recall method over two non-consecutive days, including a weekend day, for 400 students. Nutrient adequacy was assessed using the cut-off points of recommended daily allowance (RDA) and adequate intake, while diet quality and non-communicable disease (NCD) risk were evaluated using the Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS). The environmental impact of students' diets was estimated using the Plate Up for the Planet carbon footprint calculator. Results: Male students exceeded carbohydrate (310.8 g) and protein (88.06 g) requirements but had notable micronutrient deficiencies, including calcium (74.3% prevalence of inadequacy [POI]), magnesium (96.7% POI), and vitamin D (92.8% POI). Female students showed deficiencies in dietary fiber, calcium (94.0% POI), and folate (92.3% POI). The GDQS revealed that 99.8% of students (37.8% males, 62.0% females) were at high risk for nutrient inadequacy and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The mean carbon footprint analysis showed that male students (5671.55CO₂e) had a higher environmental impact than females (5020.36 CO₂e). Conclusion: Nutrient inadequacy and poor diet quality are highly prevalent among university students, predisposing them to a high risk of NCDs and contributing to a high amount of greenhouse gas emissions. University food environments significantly influence student diets, necessitating policy interventions to promote sustainable food choices while reducing environmental impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.