ArticleCell transplantation
Comparative efficacy and safety of modified BEAM and BEAM/BEAC as conditioning regimens for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05681403 (Clinical Study of Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome, Carmostine, Etoposide and Cytarabine as Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Lymphoma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Study of Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome, Carmostine, Etoposide and Cytarabine as Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Lymphoma
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the efficacy and safety of the modified BEAM (mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome replacing melphalan) versus BEAM/BEAC as a conditioning regimen for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The data source for the modified BEAM regimen was obtained from a prospective, single-arm study (NCT05681403), while the BEAM/BEAC regimen was retrospectively collected from an electronic health record-derived external control group. Primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Eighty-three patients were included, with 34 in the modified BEAM group, 23 in the BEAM group, and 26 in the BEAC group. The median times were 10.5, 9.0, and 9.0 days for neutrophil engraftment, and 10.5, 10.0, and 10.0 days for platelet engraftment, respectively. Oral mucositis (14.7%, 21.7%, and 7.7%), nausea (8.8%, 17.4%, and 0.0%), and diarrhea (5.9%, 8.2%, and 0.0%) were the most common grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities in three groups. No treatment-related death was reported. Besides, no significant differences were observed in 2-year CIR (9.4%, 26.6%, and 23.6%), progression-free survival (90.6%, 73.4%, and 76.4%), and overall survival (97.1%, 87.0%, and 88.5%) rates among three groups (all
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.