Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41170600›Full record

SynthesisInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Effectiveness of End-of-Life Care in the Community in the Asian Context: A Systematic Review.

Kanlayawee Anonjarn, Yaowarat Matchim

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kanlayawee AnonjarnThammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2149-9723
Yaowarat MatchimThammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asian countries are prioritizing community and home end-of-life care (EoLC) as populations age and care preferences shift. Asian community-based EoLC's effectiveness is questionable due to cultural, institutional, and healthcare system challenges that affect access and quality. This systematic review seeks components. This makes EoLC effective in Asia. The disparities in care models, how they combine with healthcare institutions, and cultural and family variables are examined. Systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42025644698). The electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and ScienceDirect were searched in January 2025, evaluating community- or home-based EoLC programs in Asian countries. Twenty articles (8 qualitative studies, 2 quantitative randomized controlled trials, 3 quantitative non-randomized, 6 quantitative descriptive, and 1 mixed methods) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The review identified the following key aspects of EoLC in Asian communities: symptom management, advance care planning (ACP), family and professional care, cultural sensitivity and spiritual care, healthcare system integration, education, and training. Although EoLC interventions have contributed substantially to improving care quality, the related evidence is inconclusive. Effective EoLC in Asian communities is related to culturally sensitive approaches, the crucial role of family and caregivers, and collaborative decision-making among patients, families, and healthcare professionals. Limited resource access, especially in rural locations, and inconsistent caregiver training and assistance remain issues. Healthcare, healthcare institutions, community resources, and standardized yet flexible criteria that respect spiritual, emotional, and cultural requirements are critically needed to provide fair, high-quality, and person-centered EoLC.

Indexed as

Terminal CareAdvance Care PlanningAsiaHumansAsiacommunity-basedend-of-life carehome-basepalliative caresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41170600
PMCPMC12579129

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.