ReviewCardiology journal2026
The role of intravascular imaging in optimizing renal denervation outcomes.
Review in Cardiology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 2023 ESH Guidelines recommend renal denervation (RDN) for patients with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) and preserved kidney function despite optimal antihypertensive therapy, or intolerance to such therapy. Early trials (Symplicity HTN-1 and HTN-2) showed substantial BP reductions without serious complications, indicating a promising safety profile. However, subsequent trials revealed inconsistent results regarding BP reductions, highlighting the need for further investigation into RDN efficacy and patient selection criteria. RDN works by ablating sympathetic nerves in the renal artery adventitia, leading to thrombus formation, endothelial edema, vasospasm, and dissections. Intravascular imaging techniques like optical coherence tomography have advanced the understanding of these lesions. The previous discrepancies in clinical studies on RDN may stem not only from differences in procedural techniques, patient selection and study designs, but also by lack of standardized procedural outcomes, identified by intravascular imaging. The routine use of optical coherence tomography during RDN is still under debate and currently there is no clear correlation between focal vascular lesions and long-term BP reduction. However, recent data suggest that the use of intravascular imaging might potentially improve procedural outcomes by identifying the (desired) vascular changes directly after RDN. Here, the pathophysiology and imaging methods of RDN-induced vascular lesions are summarized, the association between vascular lesions and clinical effects of RDN, as well as current guidelines for peri- and postoperative pharmacotherapy after RDN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.