ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2025
ROSBASE1.0: a comprehensive database of reactive oxygen species (ROS): categorization of cell organelles, proteins, taxonomy, and diseases based on ROS-related activities.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by various cell organelles often relate to pathophysiology or pathogenesis. Information on ROS-producing, scavenging, and regulatory proteins from various taxonomic kingdoms and organelles, enzyme classes, and diseases was scattered across the literature. Consolidation of all information would facilitate the researchers to understand ROS-related pathology and possible therapeutics. For the first time, we developed a secondary database, ROSBASE1.0, consolidating ROS protein features, taxonomy, diseases, and interactome data. Data sources were PubMed, UniProt, STRING, and Google Scholar databases. Notably, 81.5% of the reported data were experimentally curated. The ROS mechanism was elucidated for 79.2% of entries based on text-mining from the literature. A total of 2494 experimentally annotated entries (UniProt IDs) were curated in the database. Multiple PDB IDs correspond to individual UniProt IDs, resulting higher number of PDB entries (n = 9174). The database reported 2447 genes, 16 cell organelles, 395 organisms, and 218 disease entries (corresponding to 143 proteins) classified into 14 categories. In this database, proteins were classified based on taxonomic kingdoms, enzyme classes, and diseases. The keywords to search the database were-UniProt ID, PDB ID, cell organelle, organism name, and gene name. The tabular results depict all the above features, in addition to the interactome network. The database (https://rosbase.bits-hyderabad.ac.in/) for the first time quantitatively demonstrated the preferences of lower organisms towards ROS-scavenging versus ROS production by higher organisms. Categorization of different diseases according to their ROS involvement was also reported here for the first time. This database could potentially serve as a user guide to ROS Biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.