Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41171439›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2026

MRI-based radiomic analysis for grading myxoid liposarcoma: a multisequence retrospective study.

Silvia Ruggeri, Giuliana Roselli, Roberto Scanferla, Sebastiano Paolucci, Annarita Palomba, Daniela Greto, Mauro Loi, Francesco Muratori, Guido Scoccianti, Marco Bartolini and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Silvia RuggeriDepartment of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy. silvia.ruggeri@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6561-0523
Giuliana RoselliDepartment of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Roberto ScanferlaDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Piero Palagi 1, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Sebastiano PaolucciDepartment of Health Physics, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Annarita PalombaUnit of Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostic, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Daniela GretoDepartment of Radiotherapy, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Mauro LoiDepartment of Radiotherapy, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Francesco MuratoriDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Piero Palagi 1, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Guido ScocciantiDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Piero Palagi 1, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Marco BartoliniDepartment of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Linda CalistriDepartment of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo LiviDepartment of Radiotherapy, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Domenico Andrea CampanacciDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Piero Palagi 1, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Vittorio MieleDepartment of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to identify quantitative MRI features through radiomic analysis and to develop predictive models for determining the histological grade of myxoid liposarcoma (MLS). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective single-center study included 57 patients with histologically confirmed MLS (30 low-grade, 27 high-grade). Tumors were segmented and 107 radiomic features were extracted from T1-weighted imaging (WI), T2-WI, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and contrast-enhanced (CE) images with and without fat saturation (FS). Features showing statistical significance (p < 0.05) were selected and used to develop predictive models, whose performance was assessed using cross-validation and reported as area under the curve (AUC).

resultsMean age was 51.6 ± 14.7 years (32 men, 25 women). Radiomic analysis identified three significant features for T1-WI and STIR and 19 for T2-WI. For CE-T1-WI, CE-T1-FS-WI, and CE-3D, four, six, and three features were significant, respectively. Models based on T2-WI and CE-3D achieved the highest performance (AUC up to 0.88). Additional models trained exclusively on institutional T1-WI and T2-WI showed reduced performance on external validation, although AUCs improved when applied to patients scanned with the same vendor.

conclusionRadiomic analysis of pre-treatment MRI shows promising results in predicting histological grade of MLS. This study is novel in addressing grading rather than diagnosis alone, a distinction with clear clinical relevance for treatment planning and prognostic assessment. In particular, models based on T2-WI may complement conventional imaging and histopathology by providing whole-tumor quantitative grading, while multicentric validation is required for clinical application.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLiposarcoma, MyxoidMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaMagnetic resonance imagingMyxoid liposarcomaNeoplasm gradingRadiomicsSoft tissue sarcoma

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.