ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
MRI-based radiomic analysis for grading myxoid liposarcoma: a multisequence retrospective study.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to identify quantitative MRI features through radiomic analysis and to develop predictive models for determining the histological grade of myxoid liposarcoma (MLS). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective single-center study included 57 patients with histologically confirmed MLS (30 low-grade, 27 high-grade). Tumors were segmented and 107 radiomic features were extracted from T1-weighted imaging (WI), T2-WI, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and contrast-enhanced (CE) images with and without fat saturation (FS). Features showing statistical significance (p < 0.05) were selected and used to develop predictive models, whose performance was assessed using cross-validation and reported as area under the curve (AUC).
resultsMean age was 51.6 ± 14.7 years (32 men, 25 women). Radiomic analysis identified three significant features for T1-WI and STIR and 19 for T2-WI. For CE-T1-WI, CE-T1-FS-WI, and CE-3D, four, six, and three features were significant, respectively. Models based on T2-WI and CE-3D achieved the highest performance (AUC up to 0.88). Additional models trained exclusively on institutional T1-WI and T2-WI showed reduced performance on external validation, although AUCs improved when applied to patients scanned with the same vendor.
conclusionRadiomic analysis of pre-treatment MRI shows promising results in predicting histological grade of MLS. This study is novel in addressing grading rather than diagnosis alone, a distinction with clear clinical relevance for treatment planning and prognostic assessment. In particular, models based on T2-WI may complement conventional imaging and histopathology by providing whole-tumor quantitative grading, while multicentric validation is required for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41171439What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.