ArticlePloS one2025
How do healthcare professionals on non-palliative care wards perceive quality of care in the dying phase? Personal and organizational predictors identified in a cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost people in European countries die in hospitals outside of specialist palliative care wards. Healthcare professionals of all disciplines are therefore often involved in the care for dying patients. Healthcare professionals' perception of quality of care in the dying phase as well as its predictors are of interest to improve quality of care on non-palliative care hospital wards.
aimIdentification of personal and organizational predictors of healthcare professionals' perceived quality of care in the dying phase.
methodsCross-sectional online survey with healthcare professionals of ten non-palliative care hospital wards of two university medical centers. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data. A hierarchical linear regression model with ten theoretically derived personal (gender, age, profession, palliative care training, spirituality, two self-care items, general self-efficacy, thanatophobia, burden factors when caring for dying patients) and two organizational predictors (type of ward, interprofessional patient-centered teamwork) was developed. The dependent variable was an eleven-point Likert-scaled item (0 = extremely bad, 10 = ideal) measuring the quality of care in the dying phase at the respective ward, perceived by healthcare professionals. Predictors were categorized as modifiable and non-modifiable.
resultsMost of the n = 201 participants were female (64.7%), nurses (57.2%) and 30-50 years old (53.2%). The regression model was statistically significant (p < 0.001) and explained 30.7% of the total variance. Lower perceived quality of care in the dying phase was associated with younger age (β = 0.15, ρ = 0.020), being a nurse (β = 0.29, ρ < 0.001), and lower perception of interprofessional patient-centered teamwork on their ward (β = 0.37, ρ < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Perceived quality of interprofessional patient-centered teamwork was the most clinically relevant predictor in this model, as it had the strongest association and was modifiable. Age and profession were significant, non-modifiable predictors but can be considered when implementing interventions. As improving the perceived quality of care in the dying phase could be beneficial for dying patients, interventions strengthening interprofessional patient-centered teamwork should be implemented on non-palliative care hospital wards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.