SynthesisJMIR cancer2025
Experiences of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment Across Cancer Types: Qualitative Systematic Review.
Synthesis in JMIR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-Reported Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment and Psychosocial Symptom Burden in Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Psychometric Evaluation of the Romanian Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) in Women with Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cognitive profiles and predictors of cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: integrating self-reported, neuropsychological, and process-based measures.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026Article
- Subjective cognitive decline and impacts among US cancer survivors: Associations with cancer characteristics and social determinants of health.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Perceptions of cognitive functioning among 10-year breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Efficacy of walking or exercise for improving perceived cognitive function in adults during and after cancer therapy: a systematic review and network analysis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Neurological Comorbidity Burden, Outcomes, and Disparities in Head and Neck Cancer During COVID-19.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Patterns and predictors of cognitive function and post-traumatic growth in cancer patients: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is frequently reported during cancer treatment, with 35% of patients experiencing cognitive issues even after treatment completion. Commonly reported impairments include difficulties with memory, attention, executive function, and processing speed, which often reduce daily functioning and quality of life (QoL). Despite its prevalence, CRCI remains underresearched across various cancer types, limiting understanding of the patient experience.
objectiveThis study aims to synthesize the qualitative evidence regarding the lived experience of CRCI across cancer types. It seeks to do so by exploring how commonly CRCI is subjectively experienced among cancer populations. It also aims to explore the cognitive domains perceived as most affected and the impact on QoL and functional ability.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative systematic review using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology. A comprehensive search across PubMed, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Scopus for studies published from 2013 through July 2025 was performed. Articles addressing the experience of CRCI using qualitative or mixed methods were included. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, with a third reviewer resolving conflicts during the inclusion process. Two reviewers piloted the data extraction process by discussing and selecting 10% of the studies. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used for data extraction and quality assessment. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsThe database search identified 11,269 papers; 51 were included for analysis. Breast cancer was the most represented cancer type (n=32). The analysis revealed 4 themes. "Cognitive challenges" explores the impacted cognitive domains such as memory, concentration, executive functions, language, and processing speed; "navigating employment" discusses challenges associated with return to work, support, and disclosure; "emotional, behavioral, and psychological impacts" explores emotional and psychological responses; and "support systems" emphasizes the role of social and health care support. CRCI negatively affects QoL and functional ability, and there is lack of understanding and resources in place to manage its effects.
conclusionsThis qualitative systematic review highlights the significant disruption of CRCI in daily life, stressing the need for increased awareness, standardized screening, and further research into digital interventions. Improved management of CRCI can support survivors of cancer in reintegrating into their daily lives and employment. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/56888.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.