Evidence mapPaperPMID 41173016Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology2026

Linerixibat in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and cholestatic pruritus (GLISTEN): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Gideon M Hirschfield, Christopher L Bowlus, David E J Jones, Andreas E Kremer, Marlyn J Mayo, Atsushi Tanaka, Pietro Andreone, Jidong Jia, Qinglong Jin, Ricardo U Macías-Rodríguez and 11 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04950127 (A Two-part, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Linerixibat for the Treatment of Cholestatic Pruritus in Participants With Primary Biliary Cholangitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04950127 phase3completednot on this map

A Two-part, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Linerixibat for the Treatment of Cholestatic Pruritus in Participants With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2021 to 2024Enrolled238ConditionsPruritusArmsLinerixibat, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New therapies for primary biliary cholangitis.Hepatology international · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [Research advances in autoimmune liver disease in 2025: toward precision regulation and personalized treatment].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Gideon M HirschfieldThe Autoimmune and Rare Liver Disease Programme, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: gideon.hirschfield@uhn.ca.
Christopher L BowlusDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
David E J JonesInstitute of Cellular Medicine and NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Andreas E KremerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marlyn J MayoUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA.
Atsushi TanakaDepartment of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Pietro AndreoneMedicina Interna Metabolica, Baggiovara Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena and Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Jidong JiaLiver Research Centre, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qinglong JinDepartment of Hepatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Ricardo U Macías-RodríguezDivision of Hepatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alexander R CobitzGSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Brooke M CurrieGSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Ciara GoreyGSK, London, UK.
Ivana LazicGSK, London, UK.
Danielle PodmoreGSK, London, UK.
Andrea RibeiroGSK, Madrid, Spain.
Jennifer B ShannonGSK, Durham, NC, USA.
Brandon SwiftGSK, Durham, NC, USA.
Megan M McLaughlinGSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Cynthia LevyDivision of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases and Schiff Center for Liver Diseases, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
GLISTEN Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholestatic pruritus is common and undertreated in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and negatively affects patients' lives. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of linerixibat, an ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor, as a specific antipruritic therapy in patients with PBC.

methodsWe conducted a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Patients with PBC and moderate-to-severe pruritus (Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale [WI-NRS] ≥4) were recruited at 115 centres in 19 countries. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either oral linerixibat 40 mg twice a day or a matching placebo through an interactive online response system, with pruritus severity (moderate or severe) and concomitant pruritus treatment (bile acid binding resins, other treatments, or none) as stratification factors. The primary endpoint was change in pruritus over 24 weeks assessed using the WI-NRS, ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst imaginable itching). Efficacy analyses included all randomly allocated patients; safety analyses included all randomly allocated patients who received one dose of study treatment or more. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04950127.

findingsFrom Dec 1, 2021, to May 13, 2024, a total of 238 patients were randomly assigned to receive either linerixibat (n=119) or placebo (n=119). One (<1%) of 119 patients randomly allocated to receive placebo withdrew before receiving treatment. Patients receiving linerixibat experienced significant improvement in pruritus over 24 weeks compared with placebo (least-squares mean change from baseline -2·86 [95% CI -3·23 to -2·50] for linerixibat vs -2·15 [-2·51 to -1·78] for placebo; adjusted mean difference -0·72 [95% CI -1·15 to -0·28]; p=0·0013). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent in patients treated with linerixibat than with placebo (72 [61%] of 119 vs 21 [18%] of 118 had diarrhoea; 22 [18%] vs four [3%] had abdominal pain). Treatment discontinuations due to gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in eight (7%) of 119 patients in the linerixibat group (of which five were due to diarrhoea) and one (<1%) of 118 in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were reported in 14 (12%) of 119 patients receiving linerixibat and four (3%) of 118 receiving placebo. No deaths were reported during the study.

interpretationLinerixibat significantly improved pruritus versus placebo, supporting its potential to address a major symptom of PBC. An expected increase in diarrhoea in linerixibat-treated patients was observed.

fundingGSK.

Indexed as

AntipruriticsCholestasisLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryPruritusAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntipruritics

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.