Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41173843›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025

Optic disc morphometrics as a potential ocular biomarker for depression: evidence from two cross-sectional cohort studies.

Xiayin Zhang, Shan Wang, Yan Wang, Fujun Jia, Siegfried K Wagner, Yujie Wang, Qinyi Li, Anran Ran, Cong Li, Jiahui Cao and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Xiayin Zhang *Guangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shan Wang *Guangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan Wang *Guangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fujun Jia *Guangdong Mental Health Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Siegfried K WagnerNIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Yujie WangCentre for Eye Research Australia, Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Qinyi LiGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Anran RanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Cong LiGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiahui CaoGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuan YangGuangdong Mental Health Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yijun HuGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lei LiuGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1807-7296
Carol Y CheungDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Pearse A KeaneNIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Ching-Yu ChengSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0655-885X
Xiaohong YangGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. syyangxh@scut.edu.cn.
Zhuoting ZhuCentre for Eye Research Australia, Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. lisa.zhu@unimelb.edu.au.
Honghua YuGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. yuhonghua@gdph.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0782-346X

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2024T170185National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82271125National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82301260National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) U24A20707, 82171075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression, which is increasingly prevalent among older adults, has traditionally been diagnosed through symptom-based questionnaires. However, emerging evidence suggests that retinal changes could serve as objective biomarkers for depression. In this study, we investigated the optic disc signature of depression by leveraging automated fundus morphometrics (deep learning segmentation) and Olink-based plasma proteome profiling to explore potential mechanistic pathways. A total of 412 participants from two independent cohorts, the UK Biobank and the Guangdong Ophthalmic-Psychological Health Study (GD-OPHS), were included in the analysis. Our findings indicate that individuals with depression exhibited increased roundness of the optic disc (UK Biobank: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01-1.25; GD-OPHS: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.02-1.32) and a larger optic disc tilt angle (UK Biobank: OR = 2.83, 95% CI = 1.61-4.96; GD-OPHS: OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.02-3.21). Importantly, optic disc roundness correlated with the expression of two depression-related proteins, LRRN1 (p = 0.010) and PRL (p = 0.022). Both LRRN1 and PRL are enriched in the retina, as well as in key brain regions involved in emotional regulation, including the cerebral cortex, thalamus, and hippocampus. Given the strong connections between the retina and the central nervous system, our results suggest that optic disc morphology may serve as an objective, non-invasive biomarker for depression.

Indexed as

DepressionOptic DiskAdultAgedBiomarkersCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID41173843
PMCPMC12578906

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.