ArticleScientific reports2025
Synergistic efficacy of extract of Jatropha curcas seeds and enzyme extract of Serratia marcescens against Spodoptera frugiperda under greenhouse conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed the individual and combined effects of the acetonic extract from Jatropha curcas seeds (EAcJc) and the enzymatic extract of Serratia marcescens (EESm) on foliar damage caused by Spodoptera frugiperda larvae in maize plants under greenhouse conditions. In the first bioassay, maize plants were treated with EAcJc (0, 1000, and 2500 ppm), EESm (0, 150, and 300 ppm), and mixtures of EAcJc + EESm (0, 1000 + 300, and 2500 + 300 ppm) using a completely randomized design. In the second bioassay, the effect of varying application frequencies (0, 2, 3, and 4 times) of the EAcJc + EESm mixture at a fixed concentration of 2500 + 300 ppm was evaluated. By day 12, the treatments with EAcJc at 2500 ppm, EESm at 300 ppm, and the combinations of 1,000 + 300 ppm and 2500 + 300 ppm resulted in significant reductions in foliar damage of 51.5%, 50%, 49.0%, and 46.25%, respectively, compared to the control. Furthermore, the treatment mixture (2500 + 300 ppm) reduced damage by 58.0%, 57.5% and 56.5% after two, three and four applications, respectively. These findings highlight the potential of EAcJc and EESm, individually and in combination, as alternatives to synthetic chemical insecticides in controlling of S. frugiperda larvae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.