ReviewNature genetics2025
Engaging migrants and immigrants in genetics research.
Review in Nature genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Australian Public's Awareness, Knowledge and Perspectives Towards Pharmacogenomics: A Nationwide Survey, and Semi-Structured Interviews.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Monitoring diversity in genome-wide association studies requires measuring and reporting on immigration-related factors.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human populations are always moving within and between countries, setting differential patterns of migration. However, there is a lack of representation of migrants and immigrants in genetics research, which hinders scientific discovery and exacerbates health disparities. This Perspective examines challenges to equitable participation and proposes actionable strategies to enhance inclusion. Drawing from a comprehensive review of recruitment approaches, we advocate for community-centered, digitally enhanced and culturally responsive strategies, including partnerships with community organizations, trusted cultural spaces and multilingual outreach. Integrating migrants into research conducted in host countries is both cost-effective and essential for enhancing genetic heterogeneity in study samples, as it allows for the inclusion of globally diverse populations without the logistical and financial burdens of conducting international recruitment. By embracing inclusive, community-driven approaches that reflect the realities of global mobility, the field can produce more generalizable genomic knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41174180What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.