Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174252›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2025

Post mortem laboratory detection of Helicobacter spp. in swine.

Zuzana Krepelková, Viera Karaffová, Katarína Bárdová, Sandra Andrašková, Jaroslav Novotný

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zuzana KrepelkováClinic of Swine, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, Košice, 04181, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6361-1953
Viera KaraffováDepartment of the Morphological Disciplines, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, Košice, 04181, Slovakia. viera.karaffova@uvlf.sk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8424-367X
Katarína BárdováClinic of Swine, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, Košice, 04181, Slovakia.
Sandra AndraškováDepartment of the Morphological Disciplines, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, Košice, 04181, Slovakia.
Jaroslav NovotnýClinic of Swine, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, Košice, 04181, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2112-9087

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric ulcers in pigs are a major health issue, reducing productivity and welfare. Colonization of the gastric mucosa by Helicobacter spp., particularly Helicobacter suis, is considered a potential etiological factor. This study evaluated the prevalence of gastric lesions and compared three diagnostic methods -impression cytology, urease test, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (Real-Time PCR) for detecting Helicobacter spp. in pigs. Post mortem samples were collected from 137 slaughtered pigs, with three mucosal samples per stomach (fundus, pylorus, pars oesophagea), totaling 411. A subset of 20 samples, representing all stomach regions and diverse cytology/urease outcomes, was analyzed by Real-Time PCR targeting H. suis and H. pylori (ureA and 16 S rRNA genes). Macroscopic evaluation frequently revealed ulcerative or pre-ulcerative changes. The highest detection rates occurred in the fundic region (66% by cytology; 45% by urease test), supporting preferential colonization of glandular mucosa. Bacterial presence was also observed in the pars oesophagea, suggesting colonization varies with anatomical site and lesion severity. Real-Time PCR detected H. suis in 80% and H. pylori in 20% of samples, confirming its superior sensitivity and ability to differentiate species, which conventional tests cannot provide. Cytology enabled direct visualization of spiral-shaped bacteria, while the urease test was useful mainly at higher bacterial loads. In conclusion, combining macroscopic scoring with cytology, urease testing, and PCR allows comprehensive assessment of gastric lesions and Helicobacter infection. These results highlight the diagnostic advantages of molecular methods and the value of integrated approaches for surveillance and management of gastric disease in swine production.

Indexed as

HelicobacterHelicobacter InfectionsStomach UlcerSwine DiseasesAnimalsGastric MucosaHelicobacter pyloriReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSwineUreaseUreaseGastric lesionsHelicobacter spp.Impression cytologyReal-time PCRSwineUrease test

Identifiers

PMID41174252
PMCPMC12578730

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.